www - Round 9:2 > All boards Sun 28 at 13.15 - 15.00 - Swedish Open Teams 2017

Round 9:2 > All boards Sun 28 at 13.15 - 15.00

Swedish Open Teams 2017

Size:

Print this page

Cross

Bracket

Round:

Board:

Show/hide:

VP IMP Opp

IMP

Σ

Brds

Match

Line-up

Roster

PBN


	13		♠	T3
	North		♥	Q7
	All		♦	T54
			♣	T97532
	♠	Q8652			♠	A94
	♥	---			♥	KJ8643
	♦	A932			♦	Q86
	♣	KJ64			♣	Q
			♠	KJ7
			♥	AT952
			♦	KJ7
			♣	A8

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N	7	5	6	4	4
S	:	4	:	:	:
E	6	8	7	9	8
w	:	:	6	:	:
Par	3♠ by E = -140
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	2♥	E	♣A	-2	200	3		13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	2♥	E	♣A	-1	100			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	2♥	E	♠K	-1	100			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	2♥	E	♣A	-2	200	3		16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	2♥	E	♣A	-2	200	1		10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	2♣x	N	♥3	=	180			9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	1NT	S	♠2	-2	200			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	2♥	E	♣A	-1	100	7		13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	4♠	w	♣3	-1	100			19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	2♥	E	♣A	-1	100			0.70	29		56.74	9


	14		♠	T854
	East		♥	KJ43
	None		♦	AK9
			♣	KQ
	♠	93			♠	AKJ762
	♥	AQ95			♥	T862
	♦	T632			♦	4
	♣	864			♣	J3
			♠	Q
			♥	7
			♦	QJ875
			♣	AT9752

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	11	11	5	6	9

E-W	2	2	7	7	2

Par	5♦ by S = 400
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	4NT	N	♥2	-1	50			13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	5♦	N	♠K	=	400	10		6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	5♦	N	♠A	=	400			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	3NT	N	♠A	=	400			16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	5♦	N	♠A	=	400			10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	5♣	S	♠9	+1	420	1		9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	3NT	N	♥3	=	400			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	3NT	N	♥2	+3	490	3		13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	5♣	S	♠9	=	400	10		19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	6♦	N	♠K	-1	50			0.70	29		56.74	9


	15		♠	T6
	South		♥	KJ53
	N-S		♦	Q874
			♣	QJ4
	♠	KJ542			♠	A8
	♥	Q974			♥	A6
	♦	KT52			♦	A93
	♣	---			♣	A97532
			♠	Q973
			♥	T82
			♦	J6
			♣	KT86

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	4	3	4	3	4

E-W	9	10	9	9	9

Par	3NT by W = -400
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	3NT	E	♥2	-1	50	10		13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	3NT	E	♣6	+1	430			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	3NT	E	♣6	=	400			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	3NT	E	♠3	-1	50	10		16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	3NT	E	♣6	-1	50	10		10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	3NT	E	♦J	+1	430			9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	3NT	E	♠2	-1	50			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	3NT	E	♦7	-1	50			13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	3NT	w	♦4	-1	50	11		19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	4♠	w	♥6	+1	450			0.70	29		56.74	9


	16		♠	A5
	West		♥	AKJ9
	E-W		♦	875
			♣	KQ75
	♠	JT64			♠	Q3
	♥	Q43			♥	7652
	♦	AK92			♦	QJ43
	♣	82			♣	AT3
			♠	K9872
			♥	T8
			♦	T6
			♣	J964

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	10	6	8	8	8

E-W	3	7	5	3	5

Par	4♣ by N = 130
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	2♠	N	♥5	+2	170	2		13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	1NT	N	♦4	+1	120			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	2♠	N	♥5	+2	170			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	2♠	N	♥5	+2	170			16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	2♠	N	♥5	+2	170	1		10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	2♠	N	♥3	+1	140			9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	2♠	N	♦Q	=	110			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	2♠	N	♦Q	=	110			13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	1NT	N	♥5	+1	120			19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	2♠	S	♦A	=	110			0.70	29		56.74	9


	17		♠	5
	North		♥	QJT8
	None		♦	AQ532
			♣	AK9
	♠	92			♠	AKQT
	♥	943			♥	A752
	♦	J976			♦	KT8
	♣	8654			♣	Q7
			♠	J87643
			♥	K6
			♦	4
			♣	JT32

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N	9	8	8	8	9
S	:	:	:	:	8
E-W	4	5	4	5	4

Par	3NT by N = 400
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	2♠	S	♥3	=	110			13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	2♠	S	♥3	=	110			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	2♠	S	♣5	=	110			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	2♠	S	♥3	=	110			16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	3♣	N	♣8	-1	50			10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	2♠	S	♥3	=	110	4		9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	3♠	S	♣5	-1	50			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	2NT	S	♦7	=	120	5		13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	2NT	E	♦2	-3	150	1		19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	2♠	S	♣5	=	110			0.70	29		56.74	9


	18		♠	Q3
	East		♥	7
	N-S		♦	AKQ63
			♣	J8643
	♠	A2			♠	J95
	♥	AKJ943			♥	Q52
	♦	85			♦	942
	♣	T92			♣	AK75
			♠	KT8764
			♥	T86
			♦	JT7
			♣	Q

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	6	9	3	8	3

E-W	7	3	10	4	8

Par	4♥ by E = -420
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	3NT	E	♠8	=	400			13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	4♥	w	♦A	-1	50	10		6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	5♥x	w	♦K	-1	100	5		3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	5♦	N	♣A	-1	100			16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	5♥x	w	♦A	-2	300	12		10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	4♥	w	♦A	=	420			9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	4♥	w	♦A	=	420			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	3♠	S	♥A	+1	170	11		13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	5♥x	w	♦A	-2	300	10		19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	2♥	w	♦A	+1	140			0.70	29		56.74	9


	19		♠	KQ
	South		♥	AKT3
	E-W		♦	T852
			♣	AK8
	♠	A97652			♠	JT8
	♥	2			♥	Q986
	♦	QJ			♦	A76
	♣	T964			♣	532
			♠	43
			♥	J754
			♦	K943
			♣	QJ7

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	7	9	9	6	7

E-W	5	4	4	7	5

Par	3♥ by S = 140
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	4♥	S	♦Q	-1	50			13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	4♥	N	♠J	-1	50			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	4♥	N	♠J	-1	50			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	4♥	S	♠A	-1	50			16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	4♥	S	♦Q	-1	50			10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	4♥	N	♠2	-1	50			9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	4♥	S	♦Q	=	420	10		6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	4♥	N	♠J	-1	50			13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	3♠	w	♠K	-2	200	6		19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	4♥	N	♠J	-1	50			0.70	29		56.74	9


	20		♠	9863
	West		♥	K4
	All		♦	Q8
			♣	QJT84
	♠	K72			♠	T4
	♥	T75			♥	A982
	♦	AK643			♦	JT9
	♣	K3			♣	9762
			♠	AQJ5
			♥	QJ63
			♦	752
			♣	A5

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	7	5	6	8	5

E-W	6	8	7	5	8

Par	2NT by W = -120
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	3♠	N	♦A	-1	100			13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	1NT	w	♣Q	=	90			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	2♣	N	♦J	-1	100			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	1NT	w	♣Q	=	90			16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	3♠	S	♦A	-1	100	3		10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	3♣	S	♦3	-2	200			9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	1♦	E	♦2	=	70			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	2♠	N	♦J	+1	140	5		13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	2♣	N	♦J	-1	100	6		19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	1♥x	E	♣A	+1	360			0.70	29		56.74	9


	21		♠	J5
	North		♥	Q632
	N-S		♦	AKQ8
			♣	982
	♠	AKT83			♠	7
	♥	K95			♥	J87
	♦	975			♦	6432
	♣	AT			♣	KQ643
			♠	Q9642
			♥	AT4
			♦	JT
			♣	J75

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	5	6	6	6	5

E-W	8	7	6	6	8

Par	2NT by E = -120
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	2♠x	S	♥5	-1	200			13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	1NTx	N	♠7	-1	200			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	1NTx	N	♠7	-1	200			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	2♠	w	♦A	-3	150	8		16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	2♠	S	♣A	-3	300			10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	1♠	N	♦3	+1	110	9		9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	1NT	N	♣3	-1	100			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	1♠	N	♠7	+1	110	5		13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	2♠	S	♣A	-3	300			19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	1NT	N	♣5	-1	100	5		0.70	29		56.74	9


	22		♠	Q73
	East		♥	J64
	E-W		♦	93
			♣	AKQJ4
	♠	J82			♠	654
	♥	AQ2			♥	975
	♦	AK875			♦	J642
	♣	86			♣	732
			♠	AKT9
			♥	KT83
			♦	QT
			♣	T95

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	9	6	9	9	6

E-W	3	7	4	4	4

Par	3♠ by S = 140
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	3NT	S	♦A	-2	100			13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	2♥	S	♦A	+1	140	6		6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	3NT	S	♦A	-2	100			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	4♠	N	♠4	-1	50	2		16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	3NT	N	♦4	-2	100			10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	3♣	S	♦A	=	110	5		9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	3NT	S	♦3	+1	430			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	3NT	S	♦5	+1	430			13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	1NTx	S	♦5	+3	480	9		19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	2♣	S	♦A	+1	110			0.70	29		56.74	9


	23		♠	A7543
	South		♥	A6
	All		♦	J75
			♣	AT2
	♠	KQ982			♠	T6
	♥	KQ97			♥	842
	♦	86			♦	AKT2
	♣	Q8			♣	J943
			♠	J
			♥	JT53
			♦	Q943
			♣	K765

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	8	7	6	5	5

E-W	5	6	6	7	7

Par	2♣ by S = 90
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	2♠	w	♦J	-1	100	5		13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	2♠	w	♠2	=	110			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	1♠	w	♦5	=	80			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	2♠	w	♦5	-1	100	5		16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	2♠	w	♦5	-1	100			10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	2♠	w	♦2	-1	100			9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	2♠	w	♠3	-1	100			6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	2♠	E	♠3	-2	200	3		13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	2♠	w	♦J	-1	100			19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	2♠	w	♦5	-1	100			0.70	29		56.74	9


	24		♠	7532
	West		♥	QT965
	None		♦	KQ
			♣	54
	♠	4			♠	AQT98
	♥	A743			♥	J
	♦	A9873			♦	J62
	♣	KT3			♣	9872
			♠	KJ6
			♥	K82
			♦	T54
			♣	AQJ6

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	5	4	8	7	6

E-W	8	9	5	6	6

Par	3♥x by N -1 = -100
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	2♠	E	♥2	-2	100	4		13.72	68		141.17	1
1	Everfresh	3♥	N	♦2	-1	50			6.28	51		87.13	6
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	3♥	N	♦2	-1	50			3.62	34		103.30	3
2	Skalman	3♥	N	♣7	-1	50			16.38	68		116.49	2
3	San Sac	2♥	N	♦J	=	110			10.99	53		86.92	7
3	Lag Lerner	3♥	N	♣2	=	140	1		9.01	49		79.56	8
4	En påse nötter	2♦	w	♥5	+1	110	1		6.85	61		34.95	10
4	Sjöberg	3♦	E	♥6	+1	130			13.15	75		94.78	5
5	Anubis	4♥	N	♣7	-1	50	1		19.30	92		94.96	4
5	Team Zang	2♦	w	♦K	=	90			0.70	29		56.74	9

Play bridge on SWAN - the world's friendliest online bridge club.
8 daily tournaments including ACBL and a free room for social bridge.
Running scores designed by Tomas Brenning and
presented by SWAN Games www.swangames.com