Damiani Cup > Qualifying > Round 6 > All boards       Mon 11 at 12:00 - 13:30
13th World Bridge Series 2010
HomeOpen/4Women/4Plate/4Senior/4Junior/4Youth/4Girls/4Mixed/4
QualQFSemiFi+3/4Size: 1  2  3 Print this pageMobile version
RankMatchCrossBracketScorecardBoardPersonalLine-upButlerBid+playDUPScheduleRosterConv card
Round:<<>> 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 101112131415
Board:<<>> 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10All
Show/hide:VP IMP OppIMPΣIMP VPBrdsVP RankMatchLine-upRosterHand (above)(below)(left)(right)PBN
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 1NT w ♣J -1 50         12  5 
France 2 S T = 110     2   18 16
12 Germany 2 S 5 -2     100     13 16
Hungary 3 N ♣A -2     100     17 23
13 England 2 N 7 = 90     6   13 12
Canada 2NT N ♣3 -3     150     17 20
14 Sweden 1NT N ♠J -1     50     20 30
USA 2 2 N 7 = 90     4   10 14
15 Netherlands 2 N 7 = 90     4   18 22
China 2NT S ♠4 -1     50     12 10
16 Poland 3♣ E A -3 150     5   19 24
Uruguay 2NT N ♣A -1     50     11 11
17 Australia 2♠ S ♣2 -3     150     16 16
Norway 2 S 3 = 110     6   14 14
18 Israel 2NT N 5 -1     50 3    5   6 
USA 1 2NT S 8 -3     150     25 42
               
  1 8
  North AK6
  None K7543
    JT97
  AQT74 J6
  853 QT7
  T2 QJ86
  652 AK83
    K9532
    J942
    A9
    Q4
  NT
N-S 7 7 8 6 6
         
E-W 6 6 5 7 7
         
Par 2♠x by E -1 = 100
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 5 S A = 600         12  5 
France 3NT N 3 +2 660     2   18 16
12 Germany 5x w ♠K -5 1100     10   13 16
Hungary 3NT N 3 +2 660         17 23
13 England 4NT N 3 +1 660         13 12
Canada 3NT N 8 +2 660         17 20
14 Sweden 4♠ S ♠5 +2 680     1   20 30
USA 2 3NT N 3 +2 660         10 14
15 Netherlands 5 S 4 = 600         18 22
China 3NT N 3 +2 660     2   12 10
16 Poland 5 S A = 600         19 24
Uruguay 5 S ♠6 = 600         11 11
17 Australia 3NT N 3 +2 660         16 16
Norway 3NT N 3 +2 660         14 14
18 Israel 3NT N ♣9 +2 660          5   6 
USA 1 3NT N 3 +2 660         25 42
               
  2 KQ2
  East K4
  N-S 982
    KQ732
  865 J74
  AQJT65 983
  4 J63
  AT5 J986
    AT93
    72
    AKQT75
    4
  NT
N-S 9 11 7 11 11
         
E-W 3 2 6 2 2
         
Par 5NT by S = 660
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 4♠ S ♣J +1 450         12  5 
France 4♠ S J +1 450         18 16
12 Germany 4♠ S ♣J +1 450     6   13 16
Hungary 3♠ S ♣J +2 200         17 23
13 England 4♠ S J +1 450         13 12
Canada 4♠ S ♣J +1 450         17 20
14 Sweden 4♠ S ♣J +1 450     6   20 30
USA 2 3♠ S ♣4 +2 200         10 14
15 Netherlands 4♠ S J +1 450         18 22
China 4♠ S J +1 450         12 10
16 Poland 4♠ S J +2 480     1   19 24
Uruguay 4♠ N 9 +1 450         11 11
17 Australia 4♠ S J +2 480         16 16
Norway 4♠ S 2 +2 480         14 14
18 Israel 4♠ N ♣J +1 450          5   6 
USA 1 4♠ S ♣J +1 450         25 42
               
  3 J84
  South KQ2
  E-W A64
    A932
  Q 96
  JT4 A8765
  Q532 J987
  JT874 KQ
    AKT7532
    93
    KT
    65
  NT
N-S 7 5 6 11 11
         
E-W 6 7 7 2 2
         
Par 5NT by S = 460
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 2 E ♣A =     110     12  5 
France 3♣ N ♠5 -1     100     18 16
12 Germany 4x N ♠A -3     800     13 16
Hungary 5 N ♠A -3     300 11   17 23
13 England 3 E 5 -1 100         13 12
Canada 3 E ♠K -1 100         17 20
14 Sweden 4x N A -2     500 5   20 30
USA 2 2♠x E ♣A =     670     10 14
15 Netherlands 2♠ E ♣A -3 300     11   18 22
China 3x N A -1     200     12 10
16 Poland 3x E ♠K -1 200     3   19 24
Uruguay 3 E ♠K -1 100         11 11
17 Australia 3 E ♠K -1 100         16 16
Norway 3x E ♠K -1 200     3   14 14
18 Israel 4x N ♣6 -2     500      5   6 
USA 1 3 N ♣8 -2     200 7   25 42
               
  4 62
  West T73
  All AJ753
    J52
  T3 A9754
  K2 AJ9864
  QT982 ---
  Q943 86
    KQJ8
    Q5
    K64
    AKT7
  NT
N 7 8 5 5 6
S 6 : : : :
E-W 5 5 8 8 7
         
Par 2♠ by W = -110
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 5 E ♠K =     400     12  5 
France 6x E ♠A -1 100     11   18 16
12 Germany 5 E ♠A =     400     13 16
Hungary 5 w ♣A =     400     17 23
13 England 5x E ♠K =     550     13 12
Canada 4♠x S 2 = 790     16   17 20
14 Sweden 6 E ♠K -1 50     10   20 30
USA 2 5 E ♠A =     400     10 14
15 Netherlands 5♠x S x -1     200     18 22
China 6x E ♠A -1 100     7   12 10
16 Poland 5 E ♠A =     400     19 24
Uruguay 5 E ♠A =     400     11 11
17 Australia 5♠ S 6 -1     100 7   16 16
Norway 5 E ♠A =     400     14 14
18 Israel 5 E ♠K =     400      5   6 
USA 1 6x E ♣A -1 100     11   25 42
               
  5 54
  North J653
  N-S 87
    K8742
  72 8
  Q9 AK842
  QT62 AKJ543
  QT963 J
    AKQJT963
    T7
    9
    A5
  NT
N-S 6 1 3 10 4
         
E-W 7 11 10 3 3
         
Par 5♠x by N -1 = -200
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 1NT E ♣3 -3 300     5   12  5 
France 1NT E ♣3 -1 100         18 16
12 Germany 3♣ E T =     110     13 16
Hungary 1NT E 9 -2 200     7   17 23
13 England 1NT E T -1 100         13 12
Canada 1NT E ♠K -1 100         17 20
14 Sweden 2 S ♣3 +1 140     6   20 30
USA 2 1NT E 2 =     90     10 14
15 Netherlands 1NT E ♣6 -2 200         18 22
China 1NT E T -2 200         12 10
16 Poland 3 N A +1 170     2   19 24
Uruguay 1NT E ♣3 -1 100         11 11
17 Australia 1NT E ♣3 -3 300     8   16 16
Norway 4 N A -1     50     14 14
18 Israel 3♣ E T -3 300     3    5   6 
USA 1 1NT E T -2 200         25 42
               
  6 AT32
  East QJ64
  E-W Q86
    74
  85 J976
  73 K85
  J9432 AK7
  QT95 AJ2
    KQ4
    AT92
    T5
    K863
  NT
N 7 5 9 8 8
S 6 : : : :
E 7 8 4 5 5
w 6 : : : :
Par 3 by S = 140
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 3NT w ♣K +1     630     12  5 
France 3NT w ♣K =     600 1   18 16
12 Germany 3NT w ♣K +1     630     13 16
Hungary 3NT w ♠4 =     600 1   17 23
13 England 3NT w ♣Q +2     660     13 12
Canada 3NT E 2 =     600 2   17 20
14 Sweden 3NT w ♣K =     600 1   20 30
USA 2 3NT E ♣K +1     630     10 14
15 Netherlands 3NT w ♠3 =     600     18 22
China 3NT E ♠4 =     600     12 10
16 Poland 3NT w ♣K +1     630 1   19 24
Uruguay 3NT w ♣K +2     660     11 11
17 Australia 3NT w ♠4 =     600 1   16 16
Norway 3NT w ♣K +1     630     14 14
18 Israel 3NT E ♣K +1     630      5   6 
USA 1 3NT w ♠T =     600 1   25 42
               
  7 T43
  South 8652
  All Q76
    KQT
  Q65 AKJ9
  A9 KQJT
  AJ53 4
  J752 8643
    872
    743
    KT982
    A9
  NT
N-S 3 5 4 3 4
         
E-W 10 7 9 10 9
         
Par 4♠ by W = -620
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 6♠ w ♣Q =     980     12  5 
France 6 E ♣3 =     980     18 16
12 Germany 6 E ♠6 =     980     13 16
Hungary 6♠ w ♠8 =     980     17 23
13 England 6NT w ♣Q =     990     13 12
Canada 6 w 9 =     920 2   17 20
14 Sweden 6 E ♣3 =     980     20 30
USA 2 3NT w ♣Q +3     490 10   10 14
15 Netherlands 6 E ♣3 =     980     18 22
China 6 E ♣4 =     980     12 10
16 Poland 6NT w ♣Q =     990     19 24
Uruguay 5 E 7 +1     480 11   11 11
17 Australia 6♠ w ♣Q =     980     16 16
Norway 3♣x N K -4     800 5   14 14
18 Israel 6 E 6 =     980      5   6 
USA 1 3NT w ♣Q +3     490 10   25 42
               
  8 84
  West Q9
  None 98
    QJT9862
  AT97 KJ32
  A83 KT542
  QJT3 AK4
  AK 7
    Q65
    J76
    7652
    543
  NT
N-S 5 1 1 1 1
         
E-W 8 12 12 12 12
         
Par 6NT by W = -990
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 4 E ♣T -1 100         12  5 
France 2 E ♠5 -1 100         18 16
12 Germany 2♠ S 2 = 110         13 16
Hungary 3 E ♠5 -2 200     3   17 23
13 England 2♠ N A = 110     6   13 12
Canada 2 E ♠4 +1     140     17 20
14 Sweden 2 E ♠4 =     110     20 30
USA 2 1NT E ♠4 +1     120     10 14
15 Netherlands 3 E Q -2 200     7   18 22
China 2♣ w T =     90     12 10
16 Poland 2♠ N A = 110     9   19 24
Uruguay 3x S 3 -2     300     11 11
17 Australia 2 E ♠4 =     110     16 16
Norway 2♣ E ♣T +1     110     14 14
18 Israel 3 E 2 =     140      5   6 
USA 1 1NT N 6 = 90     6   25 42
               
  9 AJ87
  North K7
  E-W T984
    Q63
  Q9 T32
  932 AT865
  QJ76 A
  9872 AKJ5
    K654
    QJ4
    K532
    T4
  NT
N 4 7 6 8 7
S : : 5 : :
E-W 8 6 7 5 6
         
Par 2♠ by N = 110
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP  
11 Chinese Taipei 2NT w 4 +1     150     12  5 
France 3 w 2 =     140     18 16
12 Germany 1NT w 2 +1     120     13 16
Hungary 1 S ♠2 -1     100 1   17 23
13 England 2♠ N Q = 110         13 12
Canada 2♠ N 3 = 110         17 20
14 Sweden 2 w J =     110 1   20 30
USA 2 2 w 2 +1     140     10 14
15 Netherlands 2 w 2 +1     140     18 22
China 1 S 6 -1     100 1   12 10
16 Poland 2 w 5 =     110 3   19 24
Uruguay 2♠ N ♣5 -2     200     11 11
17 Australia 3♠ N ♠5 -2     200     16 16
Norway 2♠ N 3 -2     200     14 14
18 Israel 1NT E 2 +3     180      5   6 
USA 1 3NT w ♠4 -1 100     7   25 42
               
  10 KT84
  East 95
  All J52
    T632
  2 J975
  KT64 Q83
  AT83 Q9
  AQ94 KJ75
    AQ63
    AJ72
    K764
    8
  NT
N 3 6 5 7 5
S : 5 : : :
E-W 9 7 8 6 8
         
Par 2NT by E = -120
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver