www - Round 6:2 > All boards Sat 27 at 12.00 - 13.45 - Swedish Open Teams 2017

Round 6:2 > All boards Sat 27 at 12.00 - 13.45

Swedish Open Teams 2017

Size:

Print this page

Cross

Bracket

Round:

Board:

Show/hide:

VP IMP Opp

IMP

Σ

Brds

Match

Line-up

Roster

PBN


	13		♠	75
	North		♥	AQ64
	All		♦	K8
			♣	AQT43
	♠	K986			♠	42
	♥	7			♥	JT98532
	♦	T9762			♦	53
	♣	K92			♣	J8
			♠	AQJT3
			♥	K
			♦	AQJ4
			♣	765

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N	12	11	9	12	12
S	:	10	:	:	:
E-W	1	2	4	1	1

Par	6NT by N = 1440
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	6NT	N	♥J	=	1440	17		12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	6♠	S	♦2	-2	200			7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	6♣	N	♠6	-1	100			11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	6NT	N	♥T	=	1440	17		7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	6♠	N	♦6	=	1430			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	6NT	N	♥J	=	1440			6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	6NT	N	♥J	=	1440			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	6NT	N	♥3	=	1440			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	6♣	N	♦6	=	1370			13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	6♣	N	♦5	=	1370			6.66	54		57	6


	14		♠	9874
	East		♥	Q
	None		♦	QT3
			♣	J7654
	♠	AQJ			♠	T652
	♥	87532			♥	JT6
	♦	9864			♦	AK52
	♣	A			♣	82
			♠	K3
			♥	AK94
			♦	J7
			♣	KQT93

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	8	4	5	5	5

E-W	5	9	8	8	7

Par	3♦ by E = -110
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	1NT	S	♥3	+1	120	6		12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	1NT	N	♠6	-2	100			7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	1NT	S	♥2	+2	150			11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	1NT	S	♥7	+2	150			7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	4♣	S	♥2	-2	100			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	3♣	S	♦9	-1	50	2		6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	1NT	S	♥3	+1	120			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	1NT	S	♥2	+1	120			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	3♣	S	♥3	-1	50			13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	2♣	S	♥2	+1	110	4		6.66	54		57	6


	15		♠	KQ653
	South		♥	A653
	N-S		♦	A
			♣	QT2
	♠	9			♠	A4
	♥	KT9			♥	QJ2
	♦	KJ754			♦	Q86
	♣	9843			♣	AJ765
			♠	JT872
			♥	874
			♦	T932
			♣	K

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	3	3	7	9	6

E-W	10	9	5	3	6

Par	4♣ by W = -130
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	4♠x	N	♦6	=	790	13		12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	4♠	N	♥Q	-1	100			7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	4♦	w	♠K	-2	100			11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	4♠	N	♦6	=	620	11		7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	4♠	N	♠4	+1	650	13		13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	3♣	w	♠K	+1	130			6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	5♣x	E	♦2	-2	300			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	4♠	N	♠3	=	620	8		16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	3♠	N	♦6	+1	170	7		13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	4♠	N	♥Q	-1	100			6.66	54		57	6


	16		♠	Q97632
	West		♥	A74
	E-W		♦	32
			♣	AQ
	♠	J			♠	KT8
	♥	Q2			♥	J863
	♦	AK9876			♦	J5
	♣	9853			♣	KJ42
			♠	A54
			♥	KT95
			♦	QT4
			♣	T76

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N	4	4	7	8	4
S	:	5	6	7	:
E-W	9	8	6	5	8

Par	3♠x by N -1 = -100
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	3♠	N	♦J	-1	50	2		12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	3♠	N	♦J	-2	100			7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	2♠	N	♥6	+2	170	6		11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	4♠	N	♥J	-1	50			7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	3♠	N	♦J	-2	100			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	2♠	N	♦J	-1	50	2		6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	2♠	N	♦J	-1	50			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	3♠	N	♦3	-1	50			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	4♠	N	♦J	-3	150			13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	4♠	N	♦J	-1	50	3		6.66	54		57	6


	17		♠	KJT7
	North		♥	J9
	None		♦	T3
			♣	JT643
	♠	Q6			♠	A52
	♥	KT754			♥	AQ3
	♦	K87			♦	AJ642
	♣	A82			♣	Q9
			♠	9843
			♥	862
			♦	Q95
			♣	K75

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	5	2	2	5	2

E	8	11	11	7	10
w	:	:	:	8	11
Par	5NT by W = -460
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	4♥	E	♥2	+1	450			12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	6NT	w	♣3	-3	150	12		7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	3NT	E	♣5	+3	490			11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	4♥	E	♥2	+1	450	1		7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	4♥	E	♠4	+1	450			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	6♥	E	♠9	-1	50	11		6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	4♥	w	♣3	=	420	2		3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	4♥	w	♦T	+2	480			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	3NT	E	♠3	+2	460			13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	6♥	E	♠2	-1	50	11		6.66	54		57	6


	18		♠	5
	East		♥	Q98765
	N-S		♦	KJ7
			♣	A98
	♠	AKT8			♠	642
	♥	AJ3			♥	T2
	♦	AQ62			♦	984
	♣	J5			♣	KT763
			♠	QJ973
			♥	K4
			♦	T53
			♣	Q42

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N	5	5	8	6	6
S	:	6	:	:	7
E-W	8	7	5	7	6

Par	2♠x by E -1 = 100
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	1NT	w	♣8	+1	120			12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	1NT	w	♥6	=	90	1		7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	3♣	w	♠5	-2	100	2		11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	1NT	w	♥8	-1	50			7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	1NT	w	♥8	-2	100	2		13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	1NT	w	♥8	-1	50			6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	1NT	w	♥8	-2	100	5		3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	1NT	w	♥6	=	90			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	1NT	w	♥7	-1	50			13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	2NT	w	♥6	-2	100	2		6.66	54		57	6


	19		♠	KT9852
	South		♥	T87
	E-W		♦	AK8
			♣	J
	♠	Q			♠	---
	♥	542			♥	AKQJ93
	♦	J753			♦	T62
	♣	KQ873			♣	A652
			♠	AJ7643
			♥	6
			♦	Q94
			♣	T94

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	1	5	2	11	2

E-W	10	8	10	2	4

Par	5♠ by S = 450
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	4♠	S	♥5	+1	450			12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	5♠x	N	♥K	=	650	5		7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	5♠x	S	♣K	=	650	5		11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	5♠	S	♥2	=	450			7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	5♠	S	♣K	=	450			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	4♠x	N	♥K	+1	690	6		6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	5♠	N	♥A	=	450			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	5♠	N	♥A	=	450			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	5♠x	S	♥2	=	650			13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	5♠x	N	♥K	=	650			6.66	54		57	6


	20		♠	T
	West		♥	T843
	All		♦	AKQ5
			♣	KJ62
	♠	6543			♠	AKQJ2
	♥	KJ76			♥	AQ52
	♦	643			♦	J97
	♣	A9			♣	5
			♠	987
			♥	9
			♦	T82
			♣	QT8743

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	10	8	2	3	3

E-W	3	5	10	10	9

Par	5♣x by N -1 = -200
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	4♠	E	♥9	=	620			12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	4♠	E	♥9	=	620			7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	5♣x	N	♠K	-1	200	9		11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	4♠	E	♥9	=	620			7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	4♠	E	♥9	=	620			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	4♥	w	♦A	=	620			6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	4♠	E	♥9	=	620			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	4♠	E	♥9	=	620			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	5♣x	N	♠A	=	750	14		13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	5♣x	S	♥3	-1	200			6.66	54		57	6


	21		♠	QT7
	North		♥	63
	N-S		♦	96532
			♣	AT8
	♠	KJ63			♠	85
	♥	AK82			♥	J974
	♦	QJ			♦	KT74
	♣	K72			♣	QJ3
			♠	A942
			♥	QT5
			♦	A8
			♣	9654

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N	5	5	3	6	4
S	6	:	:	:	5
E-W	7	8	10	7	8

Par	4♥ by E = -420
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	4♥	w	♦3	-2	100	2		12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	4♥	w	♦2	-1	50			7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	1NT	E	♦2	+2	150			11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	1NT	w	♦2	+1	120	1		7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	3♥	E	♦2	-1	50			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	4♥	w	♦2	-1	50			6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	1NT	w	♦2	+2	150			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	1NT	w	♦2	+2	150			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	4♥	w	♦2	-1	50	5		13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	1NT	w	♦2	+2	150			6.66	54		57	6


	22		♠	Q762
	East		♥	94
	E-W		♦	Q853
			♣	Q83
	♠	A95			♠	4
	♥	JT82			♥	KQ753
	♦	A972			♦	KJT6
	♣	52			♣	A97
			♠	KJT83
			♥	A6
			♦	4
			♣	KJT64

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	7	3	2	9	3

E-W	5	10	11	4	8

Par	5♠x by S -2 = -300
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	4♠x	N	♥K	-1	100			12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	4♠x	S	♣5	-1	100			7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	5♥	E	♠T	=	650			11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	5♥	E	♦4	=	650			7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	4♠x	N	♥K	-1	100			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	4♠	N	♥K	-1	50	2		6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	5♥	E	♦3	=	650			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	4♠x	N	♥3	-1	100	11		16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	5♥	E	♦4	=	650			13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	4♠x	N	♥K	-1	100	11		6.66	54		57	6


	23		♠	6
	South		♥	Q76
	All		♦	K9843
			♣	Q532
	♠	9854			♠	AKT732
	♥	T853			♥	K92
	♦	QJ75			♦	T6
	♣	J			♣	74
			♠	QJ
			♥	AJ4
			♦	A2
			♣	AKT986

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	11	10	8	5	7

E-W	1	3	4	7	2

Par	5♣ by S = 600
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	3NT	S	♠8	+1	630	1		12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	5♣	S	♠9	=	600			7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	5♣	S	♠6	=		11		11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	3NT	S	♠9	-2	200			7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	5♣	S	♠5	=	600			13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	5♣	S	♠9	+1	620	1		6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	5♣	S	♠3	+1	620			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	6♣	S	♥3	=	1370	13		16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	5♣	S	♠6	=	600			13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	5♣	S	♠5	=	600			6.66	54		57	6


	24		♠	KQ95
	West		♥	J97
	None		♦	8742
			♣	Q4
	♠	AJT6			♠	742
	♥	Q32			♥	A854
	♦	AQJT6			♦	K
	♣	T			♣	AJ965
			♠	83
			♥	KT6
			♦	953
			♣	K8732

	♣	♦	♥	♠	NT
N-S	4	2	2	4	3

E-W	9	10	10	9	10

Par	4NT by W = -430
Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
Double Dummy Solver

Tbl	Team	Contract		Ld	Res	Score	IMP		VP	IMP		VP	Rank
1	Michielsen	3NT	w	♠K	+2	460			12.54	53		92.98	1
1	Skalman	3NT	E	♠8	=	400	2		7.46	42		80.56	3
2	Everfresh	3NT	E	♣2	+1	430			11.54	50		56.84	7
2	Scania Bridgekonsult	3NT	E	♣2	+1	430			7.46	39		82.08	2
3	San Sac	3NT	E	♣3	=	400	1		13.53	56		62.22	4
3	Team Zang	3NT	E	♠8	+1	430			6.47	40		32.06	9
4	En påse nötter	3NT	E	♣2	=	400			3.36	27		23.70	10
4	Lag Lerner	3NT	E	♣3	=	400			16.64	63		57.92	5
5	Anubis	3♥	E	♠8	=	140	6		13.34	69		50.64	8
5	Sjöberg	3NT	E	♣2	=	400			6.66	54		57	6

Play bridge on SWAN - the world's friendliest online bridge club.
8 daily tournaments including ACBL and a free room for social bridge.
Running scores designed by Tomas Brenning and
presented by SWAN Games www.swangames.com