Round 7:1 > All boards       Sat 27 at 14.45 - 16.30
Swedish Open Teams 2017
  1 ♠ JT9653     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  North ♥ T2   N-S 9 6 7 10 6
  None ♦ 6            
    ♣ QJ73   E-W 4 7 5 3 6
  ♠ K74 ♠ Q8            
  ♥ 8643 ♥ J75   Par 4♠ by N = 420
  ♦ AK3 ♦ QJ985   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ 982 ♣ AT5   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ A2  
    ♥ AKQ9  
    ♦ T742  
    ♣ K64  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 2♠ S ♦A +1 140         7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 3♠ N ♦Q = 140         12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 3♠ N ♦Q = 140         16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 2♠ N ♦A +1 140         3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 4♠ N ♦Q = 420     6   4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 2♠ S ♦A +2 170         15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 3♠ S ♦A = 140         8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 4♠ N ♦Q = 420     7   11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 3♠ S ♦A = 140         13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 3♠ N ♦Q +1 170     1   6.85 3   87.41 3
  2 ♠ J865     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  East ♥ 8654   N-S 7 7 8 9 8
  N-S ♦ A9            
    ♣ AQT   E-W 5 6 5 4 5
  ♠ A7 ♠ K32            
  ♥ QJ73 ♥ AT   Par 3♠ by S = 140
  ♦ T652 ♦ Q874   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ K54 ♣ 9763   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ QT94  
    ♥ K92  
    ♦ KJ3  
    ♣ J82  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter Pass       0         7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 2♠ S ♥Q +1 140     4   12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 1NT E ♠T -2 100         16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 1♠ S ♣3 +2 140     1   3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 1NT E ♠9 -2 100     3   4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh Pass       0         15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner Pass       0         8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 1♠ S ♥Q +2 140     4   11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 1♠ S ♥Q +2 140         13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 1♠ S ♥Q +2 140         6.85 3   87.41 3
  3 ♠ K87     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  South ♥ T984   N-S 7 5 11 6 9
  E-W ♦ A7            
    ♣ JT87   E-W 4 7 2 6 3
  ♠ AQJ ♠ T643            
  ♥ J6 ♥ K   Par 5♥ by S = 450
  ♦ J864 ♦ KQT53   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ 6542 ♣ Q93   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ 952  
    ♥ AQ7532  
    ♦ 92  
    ♣ AK  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 4♥ S ♣4 +1 450         7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 4♥ S ♣4 +1 450         12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 4♥ S ♣4 +1 450         16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 4♥ S ♣4 +1 450         3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 4♥ S ♣4 = 420         4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 4♥ S ♣4 +2 480     2   15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 4♥ S ♣4 +1 450         8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 4♥ S ♣4 +1 450         11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 3♥ S ♣4 +2 200         13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 3♥ S ♣4 +2 200         6.85 3   87.41 3
  4 ♠ AK93     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  West ♥ T2   N-S 7 8 8 7 9
  All ♦ QT54            
    ♣ T98   E 6 5 3 6 4
  ♠ 54 ♠ Q8762   w 5 : : : :
  ♥ Q8 ♥ 7653   Par 3NT by N = 600
  ♦ AJ962 ♦ 8   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ K753 ♣ AJ6   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ JT  
    ♥ AKJ94  
    ♦ K73  
    ♣ Q42  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 1NT S ♦6 +1 120         7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 2♠ w ♥T -2 200     2   12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 2NT S ♣3 = 120         16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 2♠ E ♠J -2 200     2   3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 1NT S ♦4 +2 150     1   4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 1NT S ♦2 +1 120         15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 2♦ E ♥A -3 300     9   8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 3NT S ♦2 -1     100     11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 2♥ S ♠6 = 110         13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 1NT S ♦2 +2 150     1   6.85 3   87.41 3
  5 ♠ 965     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  North ♥ 52   N-S 7 3 4 6 4
  N-S ♦ 832            
    ♣ AKQ32   E-W 4 10 9 7 8
  ♠ AT832 ♠ 4            
  ♥ K86 ♥ AT74   Par 3♥ by E = -140
  ♦ J96 ♦ AKT754   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ 75 ♣ 94   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ KQJ7  
    ♥ QJ93  
    ♦ Q  
    ♣ JT86  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 3♦ E ♠K +1     130     7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 2♦ E ♠K +1     110 1   12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 3♣ N ♦A = 110     5   16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 3♣ N ♦A -1     100     3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 3♦ E ♣J +1     130     4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 2♦ E ♠K +2     130     15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 3♦ E ♠K +1     130     8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 3♦ E ♣J +1     130     11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 4♦ E ♣J =     130     13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 2♦ E ♠K +2     130     6.85 3   87.41 3
  6 ♠ Q7654     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  East ♥ K   N-S 6 5 4 10 4
  E-W ♦ A2            
    ♣ AT954   E-W 7 7 7 2 9
  ♠ 8 ♠ AK            
  ♥ J9842 ♥ AQ65   Par 4NTx by E -1 = 200
  ♦ 9854 ♦ JT3   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ 862 ♣ KQJ3   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ JT932  
    ♥ T73  
    ♦ KQ76  
    ♣ 7  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 4♥ E ♣7 -3 300         7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 4♠ N ♣K +1 450     4   12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 4♠ S ♥2 = 420     8   16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 4♥ w ♣5 -1 100         3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 4♥ E ♣6 -3 300         4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 4♠x N ♠A +1 690     9   15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 4♠ N ♠K +1 450         8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 4♠ S ♣2 +1 450         11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 4♠ N ♣K +1 450     4   13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 4♥ w ♣A -3 300         6.85 3   87.41 3
  7 ♠ A842     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  South ♥ AQ864   N-S 1 2 9 9 2
  All ♦ T            
    ♣ 832   E-W 11 11 4 4 5
  ♠ 5 ♠ T9            
  ♥ K ♥ J92   Par 5♥x by S -2 = -500
  ♦ AK87542 ♦ QJ63   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ KQ75 ♣ AJT9   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ KQJ763  
    ♥ T753  
    ♦ 9  
    ♣ 64  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 6♦x w ♠A -1 200     3   7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 6♦ w ♥A -1 100         12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 5♦ w ♠A =     600     16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 5♦ w ♥A =     600     3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 5♦ w ♠A =     600     4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 5♠ S ♦K -2     200 9   15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 6♦ w ♠A -1 100     7   8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 5♠ S ♦K -2     200     11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 5♠x S ♦K -2     500 6   13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 5♦x w ♠A =     750     6.85 3   87.41 3
  8 ♠ AKQ     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  West ♥ J84   N-S 7 8 8 6 7
  None ♦ KJ94            
    ♣ 764   E-W 6 5 5 7 6
  ♠ 984 ♠ T76532            
  ♥ K93 ♥ AT7   Par 2♠x by W -1 = 100
  ♦ AT6 ♦ Q3   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ QJT9 ♣ 82   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ J  
    ♥ Q652  
    ♦ 8752  
    ♣ AK53  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 2NT S ♠5 -1     50     7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 2♦ N ♠6 = 90     4   12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 1NT N ♠5 = 90     4   16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 2NT N ♠5 -1     50     3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 2♦ N ♠3 +1 110     2   4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 2♠ E ♣A -1 50         15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 2♥ N ♠3 -1     50     8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 2NT N ♦Q = 120     5   11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 2NT N ♠3 -1     50     13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 2NT N ♠3 -1     50     6.85 3   87.41 3
  9 ♠ 54     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  North ♥ KJT   N 6 3 3 3 3
  E-W ♦ Q8   S : : : 4 :
    ♣ KJT753   E 6 9 9 9 8
  ♠ AQT3 ♠ J96   w 7 10 10 : 9
  ♥ 42 ♥ A9873   Par 4♥ by W = -620
  ♦ K943 ♦ A52   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ AQ8 ♣ 64   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ K872  
    ♥ Q65  
    ♦ JT76  
    ♣ 92  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 3NT w ♣T =     600 4   7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 3NTx w ♣J =     750     12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 3NT E ♠5 -1 100     6   16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 3♣ N ♥3 -3     150     3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 3NT w ♠5 =     600     4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 2NT w ♣J +1     150 10   15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 1NT S ♦3 -2     100 1   8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 2♥ E ♣9 +1     140     11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 3♣ N ♠6 -3     150     13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 2♥ E ♦J =     110 1   6.85 3   87.41 3
  10 ♠ QT5432     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  East ♥ A   N 6 9 4 10 6
  All ♦ 953   S 5 : : 9 :
    ♣ A62   E-W 7 3 9 3 5
  ♠ AJ6 ♠ K7            
  ♥ Q9876 ♥ KJT53   Par 5♥x by E -2 = 500
  ♦ Q6 ♦ KT   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ 973 ♣ QJ84   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ 98  
    ♥ 42  
    ♦ AJ8742  
    ♣ KT5  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 3♥ E ♠9 =     140     7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 4♥ E ♥2 -1 100     6   12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 4♥ E ♠9 -1 100     6   16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 3♥ E ♠9 =     140     3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 4♠ N ♥K -1     100     4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 4♥ E ♠9 -1 100     5   15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 3♠ N ♥T +1 170         8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 3♠ N ♥T +1 170         11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 4♥ E ♠9 -1 100         13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 4♥ E ♠9 -1 100         6.85 3   87.41 3
  11 ♠ KJ643     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  South ♥ 4   N-S 8 9 8 10 9
  None ♦ K54            
    ♣ AQ42   E 5 4 5 2 4
  ♠ Q2 ♠ A97   w : : : 3 :
  ♥ KJ63 ♥ AT75   Par 4♠ by S = 420
  ♦ 762 ♦ QT9   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ KJT3 ♣ 965   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ T85  
    ♥ Q982  
    ♦ AJ83  
    ♣ 87  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 2♠ N ♣5 +2 170         7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 2♠ N ♠7 +3 200     1   12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 3♠ N ♣5 = 140         16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 2♠ N ♦9 +2 170     1   3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 2♠ N ♣5 +2 170         4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 2♠ N ♣5 +2 170         15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 2♠ N ♣5 +2 170         8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 2♠ N ♣5 +3 200     1   11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 2♠ N ♠7 +3 200     2   13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 2♠ N ♦9 +1 140         6.85 3   87.41 3
  12 ♠ T963     ♣ ♦ ♥ ♠ NT
  West ♥ 64   N 5 7 6 5 5
  N-S ♦ AQ9743   S : : 5 6 :
    ♣ J   E 8 5 7 7 8
  ♠ KJ84 ♠ 752   w 7 : : : 7
  ♥ K73 ♥ QT82   Par 2NT by E = -120
  ♦ J ♦ KT65   Analysis by Bo Haglund's DDS
  ♣ AKT74 ♣ 95   Double Dummy Solver
    ♠ AQ  
    ♥ AJ95  
    ♦ 82  
    ♣ Q8632  
Tbl Team Contract Ld Res Score IMP   VP IMP   VP Rank
1 En påse nötter 2♣ w ♣J =     90 3   7.25 10   30.95 10
Michielsen 3♦ N ♣8 -2     200     12.75 22   105.73 1
2 Anubis 2♠ w ♥6 -2 100     7   16.11 36   66.75 6
San Sac 3♦ N ♣9 -2     200     3.89 4   66.11 7
3 Team Zang 1NT S ♦J -2     200     4.31 12   36.37 9
Everfresh 2♣ w ♣J -1 50     6   15.69 41   72.53 4
4 Lag Lerner 3♦ N ♣9 -3     300     8.10 17   66.02 8
Scania Bridgekonsult 2♥ w ♣J -1 50     8   11.90 25   93.98 2
5 Sjöberg 3♣ E ♣2 -2 100     5   13.15 17   70.15 5
Skalman 2♣ w ♠3 =     90     6.85 3   87.41 3
 

        Play bridge on SWAN - the world's friendliest online bridge club.
        8 daily tournaments including ACBL and a free room for social bridge.

        Running scores designed by Tomas Brenning and
        presented by SWAN Games www.swangames.com